pandoc - Conversion between markup formats

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Files	Lines
2019-02-27	Powerpoint writer: add tests for underline.	Jesse Rosenthal	1	-0/+0

2019-01-26	Improve writing metadata for docx, pptx and odt (#5252)	Agustín Martín Barbero	1	-0/+0
	* docx writer: support custom properties. Solves the writer part of #3024. Also supports additional core properties: `subject`, `lang`, `category`, `description`. * odt writer: improve standard properties, including the following core properties: `generator` (Pandoc/VERSION), `description`, `subject`, `keywords`, `initial-creator` (from authors), `creation-date` (actual creation date). Also fix date. * pptx writer: support custom properties. Also supports additional core properties: `subject`, `category`, `description`. * Includes golden tests. * MANUAL: document metadata support for docx, odt, pptx writers
2018-02-19	Powerpoint writer: Update.golden tests.	Jesse Rosenthal	1	-0/+0
	Checked with Office 2013. No corruption and output as expected.
2018-02-18	Powerpoint writer: update golden test files	Jesse Rosenthal	1	-0/+0
	Since the template changed, some small elements of these test files changed as well. All of these were checked with Powerpoint 2013 on Windows 10 (VirtualBox). All had expected outcomes and no corruption.
2018-01-21	Powerpoint writer tests: New test framework for pptx.	Jesse Rosenthal	1	-0/+0
	Previously we had tested certain properties of the output PowerPoint slides. Corruption, though, comes as the result of a numebr of interrelated issues in the output pptx archive. This is a new approach, which compares the output of the Powerpoint writer with files that we know to (a) not be corrupt, and (b) to show the desired output behavior (details below). This commit introduces three tests using the new framework. More will follow. The test procedure: given a native file and a pptx file, we generate a pptx archive from the native file, and then test: 1. Whether the same files are in the two archives 2. Whether each of the contained xml files is the same. (We skip time entries in `docProps/core.xml`, since these are derived from IO. We just check to make sure that they're there in the same way in both files.) 3. Whether each of the media files is the same. Note that steps 2 and 3, though they compare multiple files, are one test each, since the number of files depends on the input file (if there is a failure, it will only report the first failed file comparison in the test failure).