Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
This commit changes the `marL` and `indent` values used for plain
paragraphs and numbered lists, and changes the spacing defined in the
reference doc master for bulleted lists.
For paragraphs, there is now a left-indent taken from the `otherStyle`
in the master. For numbered lists, the number is positioned where the
text would be if this were a plain paragraph, and the text is indented
to the next level. This means that continuation paragraphs line up
nicely with numbered lists.
It also /mostly/ matches the observed PowerPoint behaviour when
inserting paragraphs and numbered lists: the only difference is that
PowerPoint was using a different margin value for the first level
numbered lists – I’ve changed this to match the other levels, as I don’t
think it makes the spacing unappealing and it allows continuation
paragraphs at any level to line up.
With bulleted lists, I’m keeping the observed PowerPoint behaviour of
specifying only a level, letting `marL` and `indent` be automatically
taken from `bodyStyle`. To that end, this commit changes the `bodyStyle`
spacing in the master of the default reference doc, to:
- line up the text of the first paragraph in each bullet with any
continuation paragraphs
- line up nested bullet markers in any continuation paragraphs with the
first paragraph, matching lists and plain paragraphs
This does mean the continuation paragraphs still won’t line up for
anyone using their own reference doc where they haven’t matched the
`otherStyle` and `bodyStyle` indent levels, but I think people in that
situation will be able to troubleshoot.
|
|
In PowerPoint, the content of a top-level list is at the same level as
the content of a top-level paragraph – the only difference is that a
list style has been applied.
At the moment, the pptx writer increments the paragraph level on each
list, turning what should be top-level lists into second-level lists.
This commit changes that logic, only incrementing the paragraph level on
continuation paragraphs of lists.
- Fixes https://github.com/jgm/pandoc/issues/4828
- Fixes https://github.com/jgm/pandoc/issues/4663
|
|
When I added the tests for moved layouts and deleted layouts, I added
them to all tests. However, this doesn’t really give a lot more info
than having single tests, and the extra tests take up time and disk
space.
This commit removes the moved-layouts and deleted-layouts tests, in
favour of a single test for each of those scenarios.
|
|
This slims down the output files by avoiding unnecessary
text run elements.
Updated golden tests.
|
|
This reverts commit 62f83aa48633af477913bde6f615fe9f8793901a.
This was already being done, it seems.
I misidentified the problem; it is really with `Str ""` nodes.
|
|
This should reduce the size of the generated files.
|
|
- Support -i option
- Support incremental/noincremental divs
- Support older block quote syntax
- Add tests
One thing not clear from the manual is what should happen when the input
uses a combination of these things. For example, what should the
following produce?
```md
::: {.incremental .nonincremental}
- are
- these
- incremental?
:::
::: incremental
::::: nonincremental
- or
- these?
:::::
:::
::: nonincremental
> - how
> - about
> - these?
:::
```
In this commit I’ve taken the following approach, matching the observed
behaviour for beamer and reveal.js output:
- if a div with both classes, incremental wins
- the innermost incremental/nonincremental div is the one which takes
effect
- a block quote containing a list as its first element inverts whether
the list is incremental, whether or not the quote is inside an
incremental/non-incremental div
I’ve added some tests to verify this behaviour.
This commit closes issue #5689
(https://github.com/jgm/pandoc/issues/5689).
|