| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
We can't always tell if it's LaTeX, ConTeXt, or plain TeX.
Better just to use "tex" always.
Also changed:
ConTeXt writer: now outputs raw "tex" blocks as well as "context".
(Closes #969).
RST writer: uses ".. raw:: latex" for "tex" content.
(RST doesn't support raw context anyway.)
Note that if "context" or "latex" specifically is desired,
you can still force that in a markdown document by using
the raw attribute (see MANUAL.txt):
```{=latex}
\foo
```
Note that this change may affect some filters, if they assume that raw
tex parsed by the Markdown reader will be RawBlock (Format "latex").
In most cases it should be trivial to modify the filters to accept
"tex" as well.
|
|
if they are separated by a blank line.
See lierdakil/pandoc-crossref#160 for motivation.
|
|
even if the `latex_macros` extension is set.
This reverts to earlier behavior and is probably safer
on the whole, since some macros only modify things in
included packages, which pandoc's macro expansion can't
modify.
Closes #4246.
|
|
Don't pass through macro definitions themselves when `latex_macros`
is set. The macros have already been applied.
If `latex_macros` is enabled, then `rawLaTeXBlock` in
Text.Pandoc.Readers.LaTeX will succeed in parsing a macro definition,
and will update pandoc's internal macro map accordingly, but the
empty string will be returned.
Together with earlier changes, this closes #4179.
|
|
+ Preserve original whitespace between blocks.
+ Recognize `\placeformula` as context.
|
|
Closes #3511.
Previously pandoc used the four-space rule: continuation paragraphs,
sublists, and other block level content had to be indented 4
spaces. Now the indentation required is determined by the
first line of the list item: to be included in the list item,
blocks must be indented to the level of the first non-space
content after the list marker. Exception: if are 5 or more spaces
after the list marker, then the content is interpreted as an
indented code block, and continuation paragraphs must be indented
two spaces beyond the end of the list marker. See the CommonMark
spec for more details and examples.
Documents that adhere to the four-space rule should, in most cases,
be parsed the same way by the new rules. Here are some examples
of texts that will be parsed differently:
- a
- b
will be parsed as a list item with a sublist; under the four-space
rule, it would be a list with two items.
- a
code
Here we have an indented code block under the list item, even though it
is only indented six spaces from the margin, because it is four spaces
past the point where a continuation paragraph could begin. With the
four-space rule, this would be a regular paragraph rather than a code
block.
- a
code
Here the code block will start with two spaces, whereas under
the four-space rule, it would start with `code`. With the four-space
rule, indented code under a list item always must be indented eight
spaces from the margin, while the new rules require only that it
be indented four spaces from the beginning of the first non-space
text after the list marker (here, `a`).
This change was motivated by a slew of bug reports from people
who expected lists to work differently (#3125, #2367, #2575, #2210,
#1990, #1137, #744, #172, #137, #128) and by the growing prevalance
of CommonMark (now used by GitHub, for example).
Users who want to use the old rules can select the `four_space_rule`
extension.
* Added `four_space_rule` extension.
* Added `Ext_four_space_rule` to `Extensions`.
* `Parsing` now exports `gobbleAtMostSpaces`, and the type
of `gobbleSpaces` has been changed so that a `ReaderOptions`
parameter is not needed.
|
|
Fixed applyMacros so that it operates on the whole
string, not just the first token!
Don't remove macro definitions from the output,
even if Ext_latex_macros is set, so that macros will
be applied. Since they're only applied to math in
Markdown, removing the macros can have bad effects.
Even for math macros, keeping them should be harmless.
|
|
This rewrite is primarily motivated by the need to
get macros working properly. A side benefit is that the
reader is significantly faster (27s -> 19s in one
benchmark, and there is a lot of room for further
optimization).
We now tokenize the input text, then parse the token stream.
Macros modify the token stream, so they should now be effective
in any context, including math. Thus, we no longer need the clunky
macro processing capacities of texmath.
A custom state LaTeXState is used instead of ParserState.
This, plus the tokenization, will require some rewriting
of the exported functions rawLaTeXInline, inlineCommand,
rawLaTeXBlock.
* Added Text.Pandoc.Readers.LaTeX.Types (new exported module).
Exports Macro, Tok, TokType, Line, Column. [API change]
* Text.Pandoc.Parsing: adjusted type of `insertIncludedFile`
so it can be used with token parser.
* Removed old texmath macro stuff from Parsing.
Use Macro from Text.Pandoc.Readers.LaTeX.Types instead.
* Removed texmath macro material from Markdown reader.
* Changed types for Text.Pandoc.Readers.LaTeX's
rawLaTeXInline and rawLaTeXBlock. (Both now return a String,
and they are polymorphic in state.)
* Added orgMacros field to OrgState. [API change]
* Removed readerApplyMacros from ReaderOptions.
Now we just check the `latex_macros` reader extension.
* Allow `\newcommand\foo{blah}` without braces.
Fixes #1390.
Fixes #2118.
Fixes #3236.
Fixes #3779.
Fixes #934.
Fixes #982.
|
|
The grid table parsers for markdown and rst was combined into one single
parser, slightly changing parsing behavior of both parsers:
- The markdown parser now compactifies block content cell-wise: pure
text blocks in cells are now treated as paragraphs only if the cell
contains multiple paragraphs, and as plain blocks otherwise. Before,
this was true only for single-column tables.
- The rst parser now accepts newlines and multiple blocks in header
cells.
Closes: #3638
|
|
|
