Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
These can make the test output confusing, making people think
tests are failing when they're passing.
|
|
The `cdLine` field gives the line of the file some CData was found on. I
don’t think this is a difference that should fail these golden tests, as
the XML should still be parsable if nothing else has changed.
|
|
I had some failing tests and couldn’t tell what was different in the
XML. Updating the comparison to return what’s different made it easier
to figure out what was wrong, and I think will be helpful for others in
future.
|
|
The numbers are added using fields, so that Word can
create a list of tables that will update automatically.
|
|
..and add new definitions isomorphic to xml-light's, but with
Text instead of String. This allows us to keep most of the code in
existing readers that use xml-light, but avoid lots of unnecessary
allocation.
We also add versions of the functions from xml-light's
Text.XML.Light.Output and Text.XML.Light.Proc that operate
on our modified XML types, and functions that convert
xml-light types to our types (since some of our dependencies,
like texmath, use xml-light).
Update golden tests for docx and pptx.
OOXML test: Use `showContent` instead of `ppContent` in `displayDiff`.
Docx: Do a manual traversal to unwrap sdt and smartTag.
This is faster, and needed to pass the tests.
Benchmarks:
A = prior to 8ca191604dcd13af27c11d2da225da646ebce6fc (Feb 8)
B = as of 8ca191604dcd13af27c11d2da225da646ebce6fc (Feb 8)
C = this commit
| Reader | A | B | C |
| ------- | ----- | ------ | ----- |
| docbook | 18 ms | 12 ms | 10 ms |
| opml | 65 ms | 62 ms | 35 ms |
| jats | 15 ms | 11 ms | 9 ms |
| docx | 72 ms | 69 ms | 44 ms |
| odt | 78 ms | 41 ms | 28 ms |
| epub | 64 ms | 61 ms | 56 ms |
| fb2 | 14 ms | 5 ms | 4 ms |
|
|
|
|
* Fix hlint suggestions, update hlint.yaml
Most suggestions were redundant brackets. Some required
LambdaCase.
The .hlint.yaml file had a small typo, and didn't ignore camelCase
suggestions in certain modules.
|
|
This seems to be necessary if we are to use our custom Prelude
with ghci.
Closes #4464.
|
|
Instead of writing my own.
|
|
There is very little pptx-specific in these tests, so we abstract out
the basic testing function so it can be used for docx as well. This
should allow us to catch some errors in the docx writer that slipped
by the roundtrip testing.
|