Conversion between markup formats https://git.pashev.ru/pandoc/atom?h=master 2021-10-18T00:24:30Z 2021-10-18T00:24:30Z Emily Bourke undergroundquizscene@protonmail.com 2021-09-23T15:01:38Z urn:sha1:8de261ba4e1e03f9dd5f78297d7299e9d78bbcfd This commit changes the `marL` and `indent` values used for plain paragraphs and numbered lists, and changes the spacing defined in the reference doc master for bulleted lists. For paragraphs, there is now a left-indent taken from the `otherStyle` in the master. For numbered lists, the number is positioned where the text would be if this were a plain paragraph, and the text is indented to the next level. This means that continuation paragraphs line up nicely with numbered lists. It also /mostly/ matches the observed PowerPoint behaviour when inserting paragraphs and numbered lists: the only difference is that PowerPoint was using a different margin value for the first level numbered lists – I’ve changed this to match the other levels, as I don’t think it makes the spacing unappealing and it allows continuation paragraphs at any level to line up. With bulleted lists, I’m keeping the observed PowerPoint behaviour of specifying only a level, letting `marL` and `indent` be automatically taken from `bodyStyle`. To that end, this commit changes the `bodyStyle` spacing in the master of the default reference doc, to: - line up the text of the first paragraph in each bullet with any continuation paragraphs - line up nested bullet markers in any continuation paragraphs with the first paragraph, matching lists and plain paragraphs This does mean the continuation paragraphs still won’t line up for anyone using their own reference doc where they haven’t matched the `otherStyle` and `bodyStyle` indent levels, but I think people in that situation will be able to troubleshoot. 2021-10-18T00:24:30Z Emily Bourke undergroundquizscene@protonmail.com 2021-09-17T15:05:06Z urn:sha1:8af15ab345bb0790cc3442722673d9da9f23a79c In PowerPoint, the content of a top-level list is at the same level as the content of a top-level paragraph – the only difference is that a list style has been applied. At the moment, the pptx writer increments the paragraph level on each list, turning what should be top-level lists into second-level lists. This commit changes that logic, only incrementing the paragraph level on continuation paragraphs of lists. - Fixes https://github.com/jgm/pandoc/issues/4828 - Fixes https://github.com/jgm/pandoc/issues/4663 2021-10-07T15:45:43Z Emily Bourke undergroundquizscene@protonmail.com 2021-10-07T14:25:15Z urn:sha1:aa78765bf9d21b3a617a9eafba59dd59e362aa6b When I added the tests for moved layouts and deleted layouts, I added them to all tests. However, this doesn’t really give a lot more info than having single tests, and the extra tests take up time and disk space. This commit removes the moved-layouts and deleted-layouts tests, in favour of a single test for each of those scenarios. 2021-10-04T19:24:12Z John MacFarlane jgm@berkeley.edu 2021-10-04T19:18:18Z urn:sha1:b8d460eeabe97756d49e4bc5f00c6bb084b69aa5 This slims down the output files by avoiding unnecessary text run elements. Updated golden tests. 2021-10-04T18:50:32Z John MacFarlane jgm@berkeley.edu 2021-10-04T18:50:32Z urn:sha1:82d587493d97536a64110902f647d953b5f28dd4 This reverts commit 62f83aa48633af477913bde6f615fe9f8793901a. This was already being done, it seems. I misidentified the problem; it is really with `Str ""` nodes. 2021-10-04T18:45:01Z John MacFarlane jgm@berkeley.edu 2021-10-04T18:45:01Z urn:sha1:62f83aa48633af477913bde6f615fe9f8793901a This should reduce the size of the generated files. 2021-09-18T16:55:45Z Emily Bourke undergroundquizscene@protonmail.com 2021-09-14T16:07:46Z urn:sha1:50adea220d09e445572e94e225fa7a81b3b2bf89 In PowerPoint, it’s possible to specify footers across all slides, containing a date (optionally automatically updated to today’s date), the slide number (optionally starting from a higher number than 1), and static text. There’s also an option to hide the footer on the title slide. Before this commit, none of that footer content was pulled through from the reference doc: this commit supports all the functionality listed above. There is one behaviour which may not be immediately obvious: if the reference doc specifies a fixed date (i.e. not automatically updating), and there’s a date specified in the metadata for the document, the footer date is replaced by the metadata date. - Include date, slide number, and static footer content from reference doc - Respect “slide number starts from” option - Respect “Don’t show on title slide” option - Add tests 2021-09-17T02:45:53Z Emily Bourke undergroundquizscene@protonmail.com 2021-09-13T17:16:19Z urn:sha1:7c22c0202e8ed706d33f301e65f0aa1a847b4ec4 In the reveal-js output, it’s possible to use reveal’s `data-background-image` class on a slide’s title to specify a background image for the slide. With this commit, it’s possible to use `background-image` in the same way for pptx output. Only the “stretch” mode is supported, and the background image is centred around the slide in the image’s larger axis, matching the observed default behaviour of PowerPoint. - Support `background-image` per slide. - Add tests. - Update manual. 2021-09-15T16:13:05Z Emily Bourke undergroundquizscene@protonmail.com 2021-09-07T12:38:47Z urn:sha1:0fb6474a55427b52bf9aebd179f7b26f30c7dbaf - Support -i option - Support incremental/noincremental divs - Support older block quote syntax - Add tests One thing not clear from the manual is what should happen when the input uses a combination of these things. For example, what should the following produce? ```md ::: {.incremental .nonincremental} - are - these - incremental? ::: ::: incremental ::::: nonincremental - or - these? ::::: ::: ::: nonincremental > - how > - about > - these? ::: ``` In this commit I’ve taken the following approach, matching the observed behaviour for beamer and reveal.js output: - if a div with both classes, incremental wins - the innermost incremental/nonincremental div is the one which takes effect - a block quote containing a list as its first element inverts whether the list is incremental, whether or not the quote is inside an incremental/non-incremental div I’ve added some tests to verify this behaviour. This commit closes issue #5689 (https://github.com/jgm/pandoc/issues/5689). 2021-09-13T15:30:36Z Emily Bourke undergroundquizscene@protonmail.com 2021-09-08T13:05:22Z urn:sha1:0ebe65e651766a2b3d006d3dee4afdfd43a386d5 There was a mistake in the logic used to choose between the Comparison and Two Content layouts: if one column contained only non-text (an image or a table) and the other contained only text, the Comparison layout was chosen instead of the desired Two Content layout. This commit fixes that logic: > If either column contains text followed by non-text, use Comparison. Otherwise, use Two Content. It also adds a test asserting this behaviour.